Post by VinylanachPost by dizzyPost by v***@aol.comOr are you
asking for trouble in general when you fold and bend cables? ?
Most people here got that. ?You didn't.
Your attempt to save face by wrongly claiming that I did not "get"
something that most did is just making you look more pathetic than
ever, pothead.
No...I maintain you missed the point. I still do.
Nope. You are making things up, in a pathetic attempt to save face.
I made no errors, and there is absolutely zero evidence that I did not
"get" something that "most people" did.
Post by VinylanachPost by dizzyI "get" just fine that you should not go out of your way to "fold and
bend cables" unless you have a good reason. ?But that is beside the
point of your erroneous statements.
No, it really isn't.
Yes, it really is.
I commented specifically on your erroneous statements. I could not
speculate on what completely different issues, obvious or not, that
you might pull out of your ass at a later date.
For example, what, exactly did you mean by "asking for trouble in
general when you fold and bend cables"? Do you mean they'll break if
you bend them tightly-enough and often-enough? Well, duh, but why
would I comment on an OBVIOUS point like that, when you were making
stupid statements about "near end crosstalk and attenuation"
Tell us, *precisely* what "most people" got and that I did not. Show,
*precisely*, the evidence that indicates that "most people" got it and
that I did not. The fact that I focused my comments on precisely what
you wrote is not evidence of this, by the way.
Post by VinylanachPost by dizzyPost by v***@aol.comIt's time to go beyond your
alleged EE and start understanding LANGUAGE better.
I understand LANGUAGE plenty well, pothead. ?You made some ridiculous,
factually incorrect statements, and I called you on it. ?My previous
posts explain the whats and whys of this quite clearly. ?On the other
hand, I have made no errors in this thread.
Except for the part about me being a pothead.
That was really meant seriously, too. (rolling eyes)
How about you accusing me of someone I am not?
Post by VinylanachPost by dizzyNow, take your beating like a man and buzz off.
What beating? You slunk into this thread like a big pussy,
LOL! I kicked your ass up and down the block!
Listen. I've made no errors, while pointing-out your errors. That
makes me the winner.
Post by Vinylanachmaking
obtuse references about weed. I had to drag the truth out of you.
The "truth" is that I was right and you were wrong. The "truth" is
that you compounded your technical errors by making personal errors.
Post by VinylanachIf you had simply made your point in the beginning, you know, as if you
had a pair, I probably would have agreed with you and changed my
original statement. But no, you had to play the role of the anonymous
Internet asshole,
I began this thread with a very light-hearted "Where can I get some of
what you've been smoking?"
You are the typical Internet asshole, refusing to admit you were
wrong, when, in fact, you were. You are the typical Internet asshole,
lashing-out with irrelevant (and incorrect) claims about who I "really
am", so as to divert from the topic at hand.
Post by Vinylanachand now you're whining like a bitch because i made
you accountable for what you said.
We can all see who is "whining like a bitch" and lashing-out in any
way possible in a LAME attempt to save face after getting his ass
kicked.
Look. You were wrong. I was right. It's as simple as that.
Or it would have been that simple, if you hadn't made a complete idiot
of yourself with your false accusations of who I am, followed by your
utterly embarrassing attempt at saving face now.
Post by VinylanachPost by dizzy(Why do I have the feeling that you'll take another hit, and attempt
to ridicule me for the plain (but true) statement above?
Because you're an asshole,
Claims the pathetic asshole, lashing-out in his oh-so pathetic attempt
to save face.
Post by Vinylanachand you deserve to be smacked around.
Who is going to do it? Certainly not you, with your seemingly endless
supply of incorrect, unsubstantiated claims.
You are embarrassing yourself.
Post by VinylanachPost by dizzy?So desperate
to save face, you are. ?"Save face at all costs. ?Never admit defeat.
Claim the other guy erred, too. ?Save face at all costs.")
Like I said, I would have changed my statement.
So you claim.
Post by VinylanachIn fact, I did so
earlier today in another forum. I told someone to remove the platter
and subplatter from the Rega before shipping. When someone called me
"I had a brain fart when I mentioned removing the subplatter,
especially since I've been so hot on replacing it with an upgrade.
You're right about leaving it in place."
The fact that you admitted error somewhere else does not prove that
you would have admitted error here, pothead.
Post by VinylanachSo there you go. You're wrong about two things now.
Please list, precisely, the two things that I was "wrong" about, and
your evidence for this claim. (The pothead thing does not count, as
it was obviously not meant seriously.)
Nope. I've made zero errors in this thread. You, and the other hand,
made blatant errors of fact.
AND you, accused me, SERIOUSLY, of being someone I'm not.
Bottom line: I kicked you ass up and down the block, on ALL issues
that arose, and I continue to do so.
What do you come back with? Some pathetic, mealy-mouthed, ambiguous,
unsubstantiated, ridiculous, claim that "most people here" "got"
something that I did not.
I "get" everything about speaker wires plenty well. I'm an engineer,
and speaker wires are not rocket science.
Idiot.
Post by VinylanachDo you want to keep going?
Not really. Seeing you writhe and twist in the wind, desperate to
save face, is an almost nauseating sight.
"Save face at all costs. Never admit defeat.
Claim the other guy erred, too. Save face at all costs."